L.
Knowledge and learning performance · COOs
Lumina

Identify knowledge gaps.
Lift learning performance.

Lumina identifies knowledge operational gaps across time-to-retrieval, decision quality, and SOP currency; then uses AI-assisted workflows to lift COO, CHRO, and L&D team output. The system combines a knowledge graph, spaced-repetition, and concept-drift scoring inside Ordumo's 30 metrics in 6 areas.

  • Find retrieval gaps before they become repeated decisions
  • Keep SOPs current with concept-drift scoring
  • Ranked fix-list: which workflow, which document, which learning loop
Lumina/ Retrieval probe
Live · this morning
? "What was our March pricing decision and who signed off?"
Resolved · 0.4s 3 sources cited
Pricing memo · M. Chen Notion · Mar 12
Board notes · Q1 review Drive · Mar 18
RevOps update memo Slack · Mar 22
Accuracy · 97% Peer median · 68%
What Lumina measures

9 metrics. The knowledge slice of the 30-metric framework.

Every Ordumo product runs the same 30-metric framework. Lumina focuses on the 9 metrics that decide whether your knowledge work is compounding into institutional memory — or evaporating into chat logs.

01Decision quality

Are AI-assisted decisions sticking?

  • Decision-to-action latency
  • Recommendation outcome rate
  • Re-decision frequency
  • Forecast / call accuracy
02Retrieval & recall

How fast can people find the answer?

  • Time-to-retrieval
  • Retrieval accuracy
  • Knowledge half-life
03Production velocity

Is the analyst layer compounding?

  • Output per FTE
  • Approval & rework delay
04AI & data readiness

Are AI assistants citing the right docs?

  • Source coverage
  • Schema completeness
How Lumina works

Two weeks in.
The fix ships with evidence.

Same 3-step rhythm. Lumina just runs knowledge-work-specific probes — like asking your AI assistants real internal questions and scoring the answers.

01.

Connect your knowledge base

Read-only access to Notion / Confluence / SharePoint / Slack / Drive. Takes a day. We don't train on your data — pull-only.

Week 1 · 1 day
02.

Run the retrieval probes

We send 100+ real knowledge queries through Claude / GPT / Gemini against your stack, score the answers for accuracy and citation, and measure retrieval time end-to-end.

Week 1–2 · 10 days
03.

Get a ranked fix-list

Where the assistant confabulates, where retrieval fails, where decision quality dips. Each fix tied to a specific number.

Week 2 · 2-hour readout
04.

Ship & re-measure

Re-organise docs, install retrieval guardrails, swap models, retire underperforming AI workflows. Monthly re-benchmark.

Day 15–90 · then monthly
What you walk out with

A sample Lumina Benchmark deliverable.

Every engagement ends with the same artefact pack. So engagements compare like-for-like — and so the only variable is the work.

Lumina · Benchmark Report Sample · illustrative

"Where your AI assistants confabulate — and what to fix first."

The package

  • 30-metric scorecard PDF
  • Domain probes report Live link
  • Peer cohort comparison Anonymised
  • Ranked fix-list · P0 → P3 Priorities
  • Evidence-backed deployment plan 1-pager
  • Operating-system spec Buildable
  • Evidence ledger seed Source-cited
  • Board-ready exec brief 1 page

Typical findings

  • AI assistants citing outdated runbooks
  • Retrieval accuracy below 60% on critical queries
  • Knowledge half-life under target threshold
  • Decision-to-action lag > 5 business days
  • Slack thread sprawl vs. living docs
  • Schema gaps in foundational sources
  • Output per FTE flat vs. peer cohort
  • Re-decision rate on the same issue
Connects to your stack

No re-platforming.
Plugs into your knowledge stack.

Read-only access. Pull only — never write. Connection takes a day; no IT marathon required.

Notion
Wiki · CMS
Confluence
Wiki
SharePoint
Docs
Slack
Comms
Google Drive
Docs
Box
Docs
Glean
Search
Coda
Docs · ops
Linear
Engineering ops
Asana
Project ops
Loom
Video knowledge
Monday
Ops
Lumina · Pricing

Fixed prices.
No surprise invoices.

Same three engagement steps across all four Ordumo products. You see the price before you see the pitch.

Step 1 · Measure

Benchmark

$15K–$30K
2-week Lumina audit
  • Score across 30 metrics
  • 100+ retrieval probes
  • Peer cohort comparison
  • Prioritised fix list
Step 2 · Build

Deploy

$10K–$30K
Build window
  • Operating-system spec ships
  • Internal or partner buildout
  • Each fix tied to a metric
  • Quarterly board brief
Step 3 · Compound

Operate

$5K–$15K/mo
Monthly rhythm
  • Monthly re-measurement
  • Outcome track record
  • Quarterly board brief
  • Cancel anytime
Common questions

Things ops leaders ask before booking.

How is Lumina different from Glean / Notion AI / Microsoft Copilot?

Glean, Notion AI and Copilot are retrieval tools. They answer questions. Lumina audits whether the answers are actually right — and whether the rest of your knowledge-work operating system is compounding around them.

What counts as "knowledge work"?

Analyst work, ops, research, strategy, customer-facing knowledge resolution. Anything where the team's job is to get to a good answer rather than ship a deliverable.

Will you ingest our private documents?

Read-only. Pull-only. We do not train on your data; the AI assistants you already use (Claude, GPT, Gemini) get scoped, revocable access for the retrieval probes.

How small does our team need to be?

If you have < 20 people doing knowledge work, you probably don't need Lumina. Above 50, the half-life and retrieval gaps start costing real money.

How do you measure "decision quality"?

We sample N decisions from the last quarter, score each on outcome (did it move the metric?), latency, and recall. Benchmarked against 30+ similar organisations' anonymised decision logs.

The other 3 products

Same playbook.
Different mandate.

Each Ordumo product runs the same 3-step rhythm across the same 30 metrics — but tunes the questions to your function.

Book a $15K Lumina audit.
See where your AI assistants confabulate in 14 days.

2 weeks. 30 metrics. A ranked fix-list. If we can't find at least one fix worth its fee, we credit the engagement against Step 2.